[ People leaving managers, not company ] - 10th sep 2005
this piece of article i find it really very interesting .... my friend had
extract this from a book and i place this article here to share with you
guys. my friend, tony, had been missing for a year ... yet to catch up
with him. but read about this article ... i feel the same too ... sometimes
in companies, it's often a management problem.. esp the direct management
problem. if there's no problem from level to level. the company will be very
successful indeed. and often when organisation get bigger, it's often harder
and harder to manage. because of the different level of channeling. read it
and enjoy :) Seems like he's reading alot recently . hehe
Early this year, Arun, an old friend who is a senior software designer,
got an offer from a prestigious international firm to work in its India
operations developing a specialized software. He was thrilled by the offer.
He had heard a lot about the CEO of this company, charismatic man often
quoted in the business press for his visionary attitude. The
salary was great. The company had all the right systems in place
employee-friendly human resources (HR) policies, a spanking new office, the
very best technology, even a canteen that served superb food.
Twice Arun was sent abroad for training. "My learning curve is the sharpest
it's ever been," he said soon after he joined. "It's a real high working
with such cutting edge technology."
Last week, less than eight months after he joined, Arun walked out of the
job. He has no other offer in hand but he said he couldn't take it anymore.
Nor, apparently, could several other people in his department who have also
quit recently.
The CEO is distressed about the high employee turnover. He's distressed
about the money he's spent in training them. He's distressed because he
can't figure out what happened. Why did this talented employee leave despite
a top salary?
Arun quit for the same reason that drives many good people away. The answer
lies in one of the largest studies undertaken by the Gallup Organization.
The study surveyed over a million employees and 80,000 managers and was
published in a book called First Break All The Rules.
It came up with this surprising finding: If you're losing good people, look
to their immediate supervisor. More than any other single reason, he is the
reason people stay and thrive in an organization. And he's the reason why
they quit,
taking their knowledge, experience and contacts with them. Often, straight
to the competition.
"People leave managers not companies," write the authors Marcus Buckingham
and Curt Coffman. "So much money has been thrown at the challenge of keeping
good people - in the form of better pay, better perks and better training -
when, in the end, turnover is mostly manager issue."
If you have a turnover problem, look first to your managers. Are they
driving people away? Beyond a point, an employee's primary need has less to
do with money, and more to do with how he's treated and how valued he feels.
Much of this depends directly on the immediate manager. And yet, bad bosses
seem to happen to good people everywhere. A Fortune magazine survey
some years ago found that nearly 75 per cent of employees have suffered at
the hands of difficult superiors. You can leave one job to find - you
guessed it, another wolf in a pin-stripe suit in the next one.
Of all the workplace stresses, a bad boss is possibly the worst, directly
impacting the emotional health and productivity of employees. Here are some
all-too common tales from the battlefield:
Dev, an engineer, still shudders as he recalls the almost daily firings his
boss subjected him to, usually in front of his subordinates. His boss
maculated him with personal, insulting remarks. In the face of such rage,
Dev completely lost the courage to speak up. But when he reached home
depressed, he poured himself a few drinks, and magically, became as abusive
as the boss himself. Only, it would come out on his wife and children. Not
only was his work life in the
doldrums, his marriage begun cracking up too.
Another employee Rajat recalls the Chinese torture his boss put him through
after a minor disagreement. He cut him off completely. He bypassed him in
any decision that needed to be taken. "He stopped sending me any papers or
files," says Rajat. "It was humiliating sitting at an empty table. I knew
nothing and no one told me anything." Unable to bear this corporate Siberia,
he finally quit. HR experts say that of all the abuses, employees find
public humiliation the most intolerable. The first time, an employee may not
leave, but a thought has been planted. The second time, that thought gets
strengthened. The third time, he starts looking for another job.
When people cannot retort openly in anger, they do so by passive aggression.
By digging their heels in and slowing down. By doing only what they
are told to do and no more. By omitting to give the boss crucial
information. Dev says: "If you work for a jerk, you basically want to get
him into
trouble. You don't have your heart and soul in the job."
Different managers can stress out employees in different ways - by being too
controlling, too suspicious, too pushy, too critical, too nit-picky. But
they forget that workers are not fixed assets, they are free agents. When
this goes on too long, an employee will quit - often over seemingly trivial
issue. It isn't the 100th blow that knocks a good man down. It's the 99 that
went before. And while it's true that people leave jobs for all kinds of
reasons - for better opportunities or for circumstantial reasons, many who
leave would have stayed - had it not been for one man constantly telling
them, as Arun's boss did: "You are dispensable. I can find dozens like you."
While it seems like there are plenty of other fishes especially in today's
waters, consider for a moment the cost of losing a talented employee.
There's the cost of finding a replacement. The cost of training the
replacement. The cost of not having someone to do the job in the meantime.
The loss of clients and contacts the person had with the industry. The loss
of morale in co-workers. The loss of trade secrets this person may now share
with others. Plus, of course, the loss of the company's reputation. Every
person who leaves a
corporation then becomes its ambassador, for better or for worse. We all
know of large IT companies that people would love to join and large
television companies few want to go near. In both cases, former employees
have left to tell their tales.
"Any company trying to compete must figure out a way to engage the mind of
every employee," Jack Welch of GE once said. Much of a company's value lies
"between the ears of its employees". If it's bleeding talent, it's bleeding
value. Unfortunately, many senior executives busy traveling the world,
signing new deals and developing a vision for the company, have little idea
of what may be going on at home. That deepen within an organization that
otherwise does all the right things, one man could be driving its best
people away.